naxparadise.blogg.se

You want lots of power for everyday tasks - and a bit of heavy-duty workĭespite its relatively low price and small frame, the latest MacBook Air still delivers some of the best performance you’ll find in a mainstream laptop. It’s also the only MacBook that comes in gold, if that’s your thing. As its name suggests, it’s still the most portable and sleekest MacBook of the bunch, with sharp edges that slim down to just 0.16 edges and a lightweight 2.8-pound frame. Apple’s entry-level MacBook starts at $999, and we’ve seen it dip a few hundred bucks below that during big sales. MacBooks aren’t exactly cheap, but the MacBook Air is the way to go if you’re looking to spend as little money as possible. You want the cheapest and slimmest MacBook With my original comment, I only wanted to show that the build in the article was unoptimized in terms of performance per dollar.Your CNN account Log in to your CNN account

I understand the frustrating crashes that sometimes happen with DaVinci Resolve on Windows (which I've also experienced while having barely used Resolve), and I understand how powerful Apple's processors are-especially with video editing. I'd like to reiterate that I have nothing against Apple's products if they work better for you.

Switching the 6600 XT for a 3060 would only bring the price up to €1890 (). Puget Systems says 8GB of VRAM is enough for a 4K timeline resolution (), but you're likely right that the 3060 is faster here since DaVinci Resolve currently favors Nvidia GPUs. > "the original configuration had a 12GB - more RAM is better for video editing." My point was that the build from the article isn't the most performance possible when the budget limit is the price of a Mac Studio. I never said that the point is to get a computer for the price of a Mac Studio. more> "the point isn't to get a computer for the price of the Mac Studio"

Also, again, the point isn't to get a computer for. Ivan Petkov, Now show me that build in Euro prices.